According to suburbanrecords.com Sen Dog of Cypress Hill has joined Sub Noize..And will be releasing a solo album on subnoize

I myself am a massive Cypress fan and am happy to hear this..

Also for all you that didnt know Cypress Hill are releasing a new album late 2007

Wow great news! Also big CH fan.

YOU CANT PUT A COVER ON THE SKY!

i love Subnoize for that! :D

i'm fan of Cypress Hill too!

Sen Dog has actually been on subnoize for awhile but he was with another band called SX10. Now Sen is just doing a solo cd. Should be good.

J

Sen Dog's voice defines masculinity.

It's the audio equivalent of Kurt Russel's beard and hairline.

Jamie

Did SX-10 break up? Anyway, it's a good thing. I think maybe he'll make some rapcore songs :) Either way, he's great.

seems like a perfect fit. i know sen dog is pretty tight with KMK. sx-10 just released a cd i believe, or its about to be released. the new cd has a song with zakk wylde on it too.

If they released-What's it's name?

i don't know what the title is, but if you check their myspace page, they got some new songs up and a post about having the album finished.

http://www.myspace.com/httpwwwmyspacecomsx10

SX10 is still together taking a break so Sen can devote some time to other projects. I know he just did the reyes brothers, new cypress cd, and his solo stuff. B-Real also has a solo coming out to.

Cypress Hill is my FAv. Hip hop band.

The album was supposed to come out in febuary :| Well, atleast I got the songs ripped-off :D

i know its taking 4 ever but hes a great addition to the camp

The albums drops September 30th

You can listen to "The Diary of a mad dog" sampler on sen dogs myspace along with "Capo"

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fusea...endid=200992878

also a new album cover


and pre-order on subnoizestore with FREE shirt and poster..

shit sounds legit.. sampler is bangin

sweet dude cant wait for that shit

Even Realists note that conflict and warfare is not a constant characteristic of international politics. Most states remain at peace with most others most of the time. State actors have developed a number of ways of coping with anarchy, of gaining more than a modicum of security, wow power leveling,of regulating their competition with other states, and of developing patterns that contain, although not eliminate, the dangers of aggression. Kenneth A. Oye shows that even if anarchy and the security dilemma inhibit cooperation, they do not prevent it. A number of conditions and national
strategies can make it easier for states to achieve common ends. Cooperation is usually easier if there are a small number of actors. Not only can each more carefully observe the others, wow gold,but all actors know that their impact on the system is great enough so that if they fail to cooperate with others, joint enterprises are likely to fail. Furthermore, when the number of actors is large, there may be mechanisms and institutions that group them together, thereby reproducing some of the advantages of small numbers.wow gold. The conditions actors face also influence their fates. The barriers of anarchy are more likely to be overcome when actors have long time horizons, when even successfully exploiting others produces an outcome that is only a little better than mutual cooperation, when being exploited by others is only slightly worse than mutual noncooperation, and when mutual cooperation is much better than unrestricted competition. Under such circumstances, wow gold,states are particularly likely to undertake contingent strategies such as tit-for-tat. That is, they will cooperate with others if others do likewise and refuse to cooperate if others have refused to cooperate with them.
Most strikingly, it appears that democracies may never have gone to war against each other. This is not to say, as Woodrow Wilson did, that democracies are inherently peaceful. wow power leveling,They seem to fight as many wars as do dictatorships. But, as Michael W. Doyle shows, they do not fight each other. If this is correct--and, of course, power leveling,both the evidence and the reasons are open to dispute--it implies that anarchy and the security dilemma do not prevent peaceful and even harmonious relations among states that share certain common values and beliefs.
Democracies are relatively recent developments. wow gold,For a longer period of time, two specific devices--international law and diplomacy--have proven useful in resolving conflicts among states. Although not enforced by a world government, international law can provide norms for behavior and mechanisms for settling disputes. The effectiveness of international law derives from the willingness of states to observe it. Its power extends no further than the disposition of states "to agree to agree." wow gold,Where less than vital interests are at stake, states actors may accept settlements that are not entirely satisfactory because they think the precedents or principles justify the compromises made. Much of international law reflects a consensus among states on what is of equal benefit to all, as,wow gold, for example, the rules regulating international communications. Diplomacy, too, can facilitate cooperation and resolve disputes. Particularly if diplomacy is skillful, that is, if the legitimate interests of the parties in dispute are taken into account, understandings can often be reached on issues that might otherwise lead to war.wow gold, These points and others are explored more fully by Stanley Hoffmann and Hans J. Morgenthau.